« War Brewing Between Iraq and Iran | Main | Leftinistra Beclowned On Terrorist Attack In Detroit »
Sunday
27Dec2009

More Tax Money Going to Fund the Anti-Jihad That Doesn't Exist

New York Times: U.S. Charges Suspect, Eyeing Link to Qaeda in Yemen

Sounds lke Obama is going to press for more tax dollars going into another unconstitutional jobs bid.

Now that most of the libtards on their asshattery blogs have been outed as the morons that they are, now they will pretend to actually know what to do and press for more unconstitutional tax dollars to be spent on whatever their AIC (Asshat In Chief) will want to do about their friends of the Jihad.

WASHINGTON — Federal authorities on Saturday charged a 23-year-old Nigerian man with trying to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day, and officials said the suspect told them he had obtained explosive chemicals and a syringe that were sewn into his underwear from a bomb expert in Yemen associated with Al Qaeda. [...]

And the morons at Think Progress, Whiskey Numnuts and Alan Colmes said what?  Morons.  They will more than likely agree with John Murtha even though all of the evidence is Al Qaeda was all over this "attempt" at killing many Americans...on Christmas Day.  Well, they don't believe in a Christmas Day (the libtards) but I do.  As reported earlier:

U.S. Rep. John Murtha told reporters Tuesday that he isn’t convinced al-Qaida is still a threat to national security.

Murtha said he visited Kuwait and Afghanistan during Thanksgiving and approves of the military’s strategy, but expressed a need to measure progress in Afghanistan.

“I don’t agree there is a threat to national security,” Murtha said, while not ruling out the possibility that he could be wrong about al-Qaida’s influence. “They keep saying they’ve defeated al-Qaida.”

Murtha.  The PA Crook and Liar.  Obama the Jihadi Sympathizer.  One in the same.

WOW!  I just caught this one over at American Thinker: Terrorism? What terrorism, asks mediia?  So, here we have the Obamedia playing all of this down while the Jihadi scum bag is being held on terrorism charges.  Isn't that quite swell?

Two things leapt to mind as I read the opening: 1) Just why is it important that the White House called it terrorism? Is the subtext that President Obama is somehow "tough" on terrorism? Would it matter if the reporter's Aunt Mame defined it for us? Isn't any reader with a sixth-grade education, the target reading level of American newspapers, able to figure that out for him/herself? But now we know what to think, because Obama told us so. 2) It's an "attempted" act of terrorism. No terrorism here, folks. Yes, "several of the 278 passengers receiv[ed] minor injuries," and there will no doubt be counseling for post-traumatic stress disorder. But maybe just the knowledge that it was simply "attempted" terrorism will be comfort enough to all those aboard Flight 253. [...]

I also just found these articles...

ABCNEWS: Officials: Only A Failed Detonator Saved Northwest Flight

So much for the fireworks gig.

Pat Dollard: Northwest Airlines Bomb Plot Planned By Al Qaeda In Yemen

Pat Dollard: Christmas Terror Bombing Throws Monkey Wrench In Obama’s Plans To Close Gitmo

Ed Morrissey / Hot Air: Investigators: Terrorist wore suicide underwear made by top AQ bombmaker in Yemen

Great Balls of Fire!

Flight 253 Hero Describes Battle With Terrorist

Father Of Terrorist Warned US

And Obama did nothing?  Simpleton.

Revisiting the 'Terrorist Threat Debate'

I'm thinking about the circumstances surrounding the attack on Northwest Flight 253. I always do whenever there's another terrorist attack. I'm especially intrigued -- no bothered, actually -- by the response of the leftists. I've commented already on folks like Spencer Ackerman and Matthew Yglesias, inveterate America-bashers, so no need to rehash it. No, my sense is that even level-headed folks fail to appreciate the transformation in circumstances of American and international life since September 11, 2001 -- a transformation that had been building for sometime, as in the nature of global conflict and the increasingly catastrophic incidence of attacks on citizens of the United States and elsewhere. We don't think too often about this, since the possibility of personal danger seems so far removed for most people -- but also because it's been almost ten years since the attacks on New York and Washington. Time heals all wounds, so in that sense our healing has also made us increasingly impervious to the continuing threat of diabolical terrorism. [...]

Northwest Airlines Attack: Security Failure of Staggering Proportions

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

time healing all wounds my ass.

These people are relentless and, like the IRA, haven't "gone away"

December 27, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterkris

Very true but Murtha says AQ isn't a problem anymore. Murtha. ASSHAT!

December 27, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>